Marty Walters
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Cleaning up HazMat in California

4/27/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Photo by Aleks Dorohovich on Unsplash
I am often asked about why cleanup activities in California are more complicated than in other states.  The quick answer is that California has several different laws that could trigger cleanups, and there may be a number of different regulatory agencies involved depending on the source of the contamination and the extent of contamination - whether soil, groundwater, surface water, or sediment is affected.
California is like other states, in that you must identify all the exposure pathways and address risks for human health and environmental receptors in order to close out a hazardous substance or petroleum release site.  Background levels for metals can be used to support a finding of no release. Each agency has its own closeout checklist that is completed as part of the final assessment prior to regulatory closure. Engineering controls and institutional controls are used to supplement cleanup remedies and may remain in place in perpetuity through deed notices and deed restrictions.  The process for completing remediation varies from one regulatory program to another. The key regulatory programs include:
  1. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Site Mitigation program under the Hazardous Substances Account Act
  2. Water boards who oversee leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cleanup programs
  3. Water boards who oversee cleanup programs under Porter-Cologne Act
  4. DTSC Corrective Action program for hazardous waste Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities (these include treatment, storage, and disposal facilities as well as tiered permit facilities)
  5. Various brownfield programs and statutes, which are implemented at all different levels within California, including state agencies, county agencies, and cities.
  6. Federal Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) programs for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) regulated under that federal law.
All decisions are made by state and local regulators, and decision making authority is established at the federal and/or state level and formally delegated down to state/local agencies.  Cleanup activities must be performed by professional geologists or professional civil engineers. There are two key regulatory agencies who set cleanup standards in California – the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).
DTSC uses soil cleanup standards that are geared toward human exposure and are developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA):
http://www.oehha.org/risk.html
DTSC also has its own method for assessing risks from soil vapor intrusion:
https://dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Vapor_Intrusion.cfm
The SWRCB is a state agency, with Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) for nine regions across California.  Water protection, for groundwater and surface waters, fall under the authority of these agencies.
Environmental Screening Levels (ESL) were established for a wide range of exposure pathways and environmental conditions, and they address both human and environmental receptors.  These are updated quite frequently, most recently in 2013. The Los Angeles and San Francisco Bay regional boards put these together, but they are applied across the state.
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb2/water_issues/programs/esl.shtml
In order to properly apply the ESLs, it’s critical that the applicable basin plan be consulted to identify all beneficial uses of surface and groundwater for the subject site, as these beneficial uses will drive the selection of screening criteria.
For complex sites where screening levels may not adequately address multiple contaminants or synergistic effects, USEPA’s CERCLA risk assessment methodology may be used to set cleanup levels for a cleanup project.
1 Comment
Lighting Warren link
7/9/2022 12:13:14 am

Hello mmate nice post

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Marty Walters

    Environmental Scientist

    Archives

    March 2021
    February 2021
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2018
    August 2017
    August 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Arizona
    California
    China
    Climate
    Demolition
    Environment
    Environmental
    Family
    HazMat
    Innovation
    Japan
    Nuclear Power
    Stormwater
    Wood Science

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly